Ghana’s economy heads
for a collapse as President Mahama sticks to
his rhetorical solutions…
Nana Attobrah Quaicoe
February 17, 2015
Living in Ghana these days comes with a lot
of pain and sacrifice. People are not just
having to cope with the most unbearable
difficulties, but living in itself gets
worse by the day and there is not a glimmer
of hope in sight. It is as if we have been
afflicted with the most clueless leadership
ever. Everyman for himself is the new order.
Governance has been reduced to cheap
rhetorical with a gaping widening disconnect
between what Ghanaians experience daily in
their lives and what leadership is saying to
be done or doing. Government’s recklessness
at managing the economy plus its gross
physical indiscipline and its indecision has
cast a spell of inertia over the entire
country. Ghanaians are being subjected to
untold hardships.
Let’s not kid ourselves, the future looks
gloomy. Every fiber of evidence points to
one scary but indisputable fact – THE
GHANAIAN ECONOMY IS GRINDING TOWARDS A
COLLAPSE! We are living in the worst of all
possible times and even the diehard optimist
like myself fears this is true!!
There is not one sector of our national
economy that seems to work. Worse now is the
gripping state of our energy situation that
has cost this country about $3 billion. The
truth though is that our power situation
does not exist in isolation of the rest of
the economy, it is a reflection and an
integral part of the entire government
induced mess. How on earth did we drag
ourselves here in the first place, I ask.
For the past 36 months or so, leadership has
been pretending to be dealing with a
situation that practically worsens in spite
of all the interventions claimed to have
been made albeit at the lip level. I
describe the situation as worse not just
because of its economic cost but rather
because the government had the benefit of an
advance warning from the VRA, that the
country’s power sector was heading towards
where we now find ourselves….24 hours of
‘dum’ and 12 hours of ‘sor’!! Government
also had the benefit of the knowledge of the
cyclical drought associated with our hydro
dams. With the benefit of all these
information, the least one could expect was
a plan to avert the disaster but that too
remained at the rhetorical level. 3 years
down the line, the president is still
searching for funding for his loudly
trumpeted Turkish barge while cold stores,
hospitals, schools, sachet water producers,
factories, hotels, banks, beer bars and
night clubs, barbers and hair dressers all
reel under the weight of the longest and
most intensive load shedding ever in the
history of Ghana without a clue to when it
would end. If this is not a manifestation of
stack incompetence, then I fail to know what
else is.
Worst of all the situations is that the
words of the President, call them
directives, promises or assurances mean next
to nothing. His words don’t get anything
done. The words of President John Mahama has
proven to lack gravitas as far as governance
and providing solutions to the needs of
Ghanaians are concerned. In the midst of the
energy crisis that we find ourselves, we are
yet to see any comprehensively packaged
solution for scrutiny with benchmarks and
timelines for the immediate, short and
medium term resolution strategies. It’s been
the case of one failed Presidential
directive to the other, one failed assurance
upon the other and one failed promise after
the other. The President’s defense that the
power crisis cannot be resolved overnight is
neither here nor there. He has had much more
than an overnight to resolve the power
problem. Indeed the latest power crisis
equally did not happen overnight, it’s been
with us for the past 3 years.
It had been so easy and convenient for
government to heap the blame for our energy
crisis on the Nigerians and the West African
Gas Pipeline. Subsequently, we were told
that the tariffs we were paying was too low
to enable VRA buy the needed crude oil and
once we paid the ‘realistic tariffs’,
voila!!, all our power challenges would
evaporate. Consequently, we were slapped
with tariff increment after which reliable
power still remained an illusion. Next, the
President and his team assured Ghanaians
that once Bui dam came on stream, the days
of dumsor would end, that too failed with a
bizarre explanation that Bui was never built
to run all of its 4 turbines else the water
in the dam would run out. Then came the
mother of all promises, which said the magic
wand lies with the Atuabo gas plant which
was expected to deliver 120 mmscf of gas per
day. Once this was achieved, there would be
no need to rely on the erratic gas supply
from Nigeria because we would have our own
reliable gas supply. Behold, Atuabo is here
albeit late and after several failed
completion dates. The question now is, why
are we still experiencing a worsening dumsor?
In the past few days to weeks, our power
generation has worsened and running on less
than 1410 MW at peak. Akosombo has had 2
units shut down and threatening to shut down
a 3rd because of the declining water levels.
Even the remaining turbines at Akosombo are
forced to run at levels far below their
installed capacity. Bui, by default,
operates at half its quoted installed
capacity and is now doing half of even that.
Kpong is down also due to low water levels
and retrofitting. TICO has 2 units down,
undergoing repair works, so that even if
there is reliable gas supply from Atuabo or
anywhere, the plants would still not run at
its optimal capacity and therefore we would
still be load shedding.
Again, if its not the absence of a power
generation strategy, why would we have an
ongoing 220 MW installation project (Ktpp)
at Tema that is designed to exclusively feed
on gas from the WAGPL which history has
shown to unreliable? We want to be
self-reliant, so why was Atuabo not designed
to feed into the pipes of the WAGPL such
that in the failure of the WAGPL, Ktpp can
still be fed with Atuabo processed gas? The
project is nearing completion and Atuabo gas
by design is unable to supply this new plant
with feed and so in the midst of plenty gas,
Ktpp will have to be fed from elsewhere.
And we have the President and his team act
like Ghanaians are a bunch of ignoramuses
who are rather impressed by his chain of
rhetorics and syllable recital perhaps
hoping to speak or wish solutions into the
problems without planning, strategy and
action.., his latest energy solution
strategy in the creation of a Power Ministry
only betrays his ill appreciation of what
really the challenge is about. The newly
appointed Power minister also seeming eager
to impress his appointing powers, rather
betrays his frustration and desperation. He
calls a press conference that not only
succeeded in restating the power problems as
we have always been aware of but also
telling us the President is lazy. He
describes Journalists as being lazy for ever
believing without investigating, that poor
gas supply from Nigeria was the cause of
Ghana’s power crisis. I ask the Minister,
why he stopped short of calling the
President lazy because he was chief in
trumpeting that allegation. Indeed, few days
ago in Germany, before the Power Minister’s
press conference, President Mahama, in
responding to questions and briefing
Ghanaians resident in Germany on the
challenges facing the country, repeated his
claim that unreliable gas supply from
Nigeria was mainly responsible for the
current ‘dumsor’. Was the President taking
his information from the lazy journalist or
his appointees?
Like I said earlier, even if Ghana receives
the complement of all the gas reserves in
the world, Ghanaians will still be under
load shedding. Why? Because our current
predicament is not due to poor gas supplies
but to do with the disrepair state of our
energy installations and the low water
levels in our dams. Due to persistent
political interference, these facilities
were denied their scheduled maintenance
because the powers that be, considered as
more important the political gains to me
made from having power albeit erratic than
the collateral damage and cost to the
economy when the system collapsed as a
result of neglecting scheduled maintenance.
It is in similar brazen recklessness that
government few days ago forced Akosombo dam
at record low water levels to run five of
its six turbines just to ensure there was
power for Ghanaians to be excited during the
xmas and football fans enjoyed the African
Cup of Nations. Power from Cote d’Ivoire
indeed. How much power was actually imported
from that West African country? Less than
100 MW and that alone could not have been
sufficient to power most of Ghana. That
singular act of recklessness nearly
collapsed the already challenged dam, but
does he even care?
About a year ago, the President made a
promise to Ghanaians to deliver a 450 MW
barge from Turkey to finally end the dumsor.
12 months down the line, the barge is yet to
arrive on the shores of Ghana and only last
week, President Mahama is now forcing GNPC
to raise the necessary funding required for
the deal to go through. Another question to
ask is: where will the Turkish barge get its
feed to power itself since it would not be
arriving with crude nor gas? Is government
prepared to pay for the cost of crude oil
which price is gradually bouncing back, not
overlooking the resumption of decline of the
cedi? If money is readily available to
sustainably buy crude for the barge, why is
government not buying this same crude oil to
power the CENIT and other smaller plants at
Tema not affected by disrepair which could
have easily provided Ghanaians relief of
some 150 MW all this while? None of the
thermal turbines we have produces more than
150 MW, yet each takes about 5000 barrels of
light crude oil (LCO) to provide us power.
In the very recent time, VRA was spending
$55 million every 3 weeks only to charge
tariffs that could barely cover 60% of its
operational cost. The continuation of such
forced illogical operation at VRA will only
end up destroying that National Asset
because it’s unsustainable!
Even the much hyped GE 1,000 MW thermal
plant touted to deliver about 1200 MW from
the 170 mmscf/d ENI gas project albeit at
the rhetorical stage would require in-depth
scrutiny if/whenever the technical and
financial details of the deal are made
public. A simple comparison between the 550
MW Aboadze plant which requires 120 mmscf/d
and the GE1000 MW plant which is expected to
feed on the 170 mmscf/d from the ENI fields
will suggest that the surplus 50 mmscf/d
from the ENI project is woefully
insufficient to generate the extra 650 MW
that government claims. Granted that the gas
from the Ghanaian fields is denser than what
we receive from the WAGPL, what type of
turbines are we to expect with the GE1000?
What are their efficiency levels? GE has
recently developed very efficient turbines
that come with a very huge price tag. It
will therefore be nice to know the total
value of the proposed GE plant. And at what
temperature will the gas be pumped because
they all help in determining the efficiency
at which the turbines produce power? It will
be another sad episode if this rhetorical
project finally translates to reality only
to be given excuses as has been given in the
case of Bui dam on the reason why the plant
will be running on a capacity different and
less than its installed capacity. Until we
get the technical details of the project,
Ghanaians should hold their breath because
it is difficult to evaluate how 170 mmscf/d
can produce 1200MW.
The crux of the power problem, which the
President and his team continuously shy away
from or pretend to be unaware of, can be
found in the low tariff regime of our power
generation and sales arrangements. Any
solution that seeks to address the energy
problem without tackling head-on Ghana’s
poor electricity tariffs is only scratching
the surface and therefore unrealistic and
unsustainable. Gas is not that scarce,
indeed, there is sufficient gas for sale out
there. As it is, industry and domestic
consumers are paying far more for the cost
of power that they use as a result of load
shedding and line losses. The business of
power generation is a capital intensive one
just as it is highly rewarding for the
investor as well as the consumer and country
so long as the pricing fundamentals are set
right. This is the only incentive that can
attract and sustain the commercial interest
of Independent Power Producers (IPP).
Government lacks the financial muscle to
realistically and directly engage in the
business of power. It is such dealings that
have almost collapsed the VRA where
government forces it to incur debt by
selling power at rates less than it cost to
acquire and cater for its operational cost,
hence the increasing inability of the state
entity to raise the requisite LC’s to buy
crude oil.
There is a growing campaign for cleaner and
renewable energy like solar but then what
will it cost in terms of funds and land
space to produce say 550MW from solar?
Though these huge investments can pay for
themselves over the long term, they remain
unattractive due to the huge financial
commitments required for the production of a
unit of power. The world’s largest and most
modern solar farm in California called Topaz
was completed in 2014. It produces 550 MW,
with 9 million solar panels, covering an
area space of 25km2 costing $2.5 billion.
Ghana should stop talking about producing
power for export and focus on the
relationships that will be generating
reliable power for domestic and commercial
consumers. If we had a blueprint stating
what amount of energy that would be needed
to reliably power Ghana commercially and
domestically for the next 5, 10, 15, 20 to
50 years, we would realize that 5000 MW is
nothing to be jumping about in excitement of
exporting prospects because any serious
country thinks about industrial growth when
it plans for power growth unless of course
the Minister of Energy hopes that this
present crisis would have completely
collapsed the little manufacturing base that
we have left at the time the rhetorical 5000
MW comes to physical manifestation. A
country that does not have its power
dynamics right, simply has no business
planning for or expecting economic growth.
Ghana is not broke because we do not have
resources, rather, it’s the abundance of it
and lack of visionary and competent
leadership.
For any leader to be taken seriously by his
followers, team and peers alike, his words
must be of substance and carry weight. There
must be a corresponding relationship between
what the leader says and what is happening
on the ground. This means that sufficient
planning plus grounds work must have been
done, and only waiting for the president’s
words to activate prompt execution. More
than any PR gimmick like gazing into the
skies and pointing towards heaven, the
delivery on the words of the President is a
more effective and sustainable PR else his
words are taken as empty and not taken
seriously. Any leader whose words can’t be
taken seriously is finished. Evidence
abounds showing that there are little or no
foundations laid for all the assurances,
promises and directives emanating from the
presidency and therefore all the
disappointments. The best PR any leader can
ask for is the promptness with which action
is initiated and delivery made on his
directives. Action they say speaks louder
than words. It is the measure of an
effective and purposeful leader. Aside the
inadequacy of tried and competent hands
around the President, another area, his
leadership is showing to grossly lack is not
having actions backing his words. And that
does not excite confidence of the people in
a leader. As it stands now, the president’s
words are proving to be empty and only worth
a pretentious PR value. Problem resolutions
with President Mahama begins and ends at the
rhetorical level.
Nana Attobrah Quaicoe
The author of this article is the Head of
Research at the Danquah Institute.
nattobrah@danquahinstitute.org
nattobrah25@gmail.com
|