PRESS STATEMENT NPP
MONDAY 16th MAY 2016
PRESIDENT MAHAMA LIED
ON BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION
President Mahama has
said in London (Thursday 12th may 2016) that his
government has a good record in fighting corruption. He
also added, whiles fumbling, that he has never taken
bribe as a human being. To prove this, he said has never
involved himself or his office (the Presidency) directly
in any public procurement deal. Again, he suggested that
no Minister or appointee of his has been involved in
corruption.
The New Patriotic Party is
shocked by the lies peddled by the President during a
summit designed to tackle that very canker of
corruption. Without honesty and sincerity from the
Presidency the fight against the theft of public funds
can never be won so long as he remains in office. It is
no wonder that that culture of plunging state coffers
has actually worsened under President Mahama and would
only get worse unless Ghanaians vote him out this year.
We will mention just a few
specific contracts in support of our claim that Ghana
under President Mahama is experiencing the Golden Age of
Corruption and will demand that the President comes
clean to the people on whether those claims he made in
the United Kingdom last week can stand scrutiny. We will
cite just six examples were his own personal involvement
is not in doubt.
1. The sole sourced Nation
Single Window contract for West Blue 2. The GHC3.6
million Smarttys bus branding scandal 3. The $88
million Embraer Jet scandal 4. The $10 billion STX
scandal 5. $600m worth of contracts with shady
Queiroz Galvao and 6. The secret, illegal lodging of
$250m in UBA.
1. President Mahama told a blatant
lie when he said in London that he does not put himself
in a position to be bribed as he does not involve
himself and his Office in public procurement. As fate
will have it, on 12th May, 2015, exactly a year ago to
the day he granted the BBC interview, the President,
through a letter signed by his Chief of Staff, Julius
Debrah, personally and directly instructed the Minister
of Finance “to formally engage West Blue Ghana Limited”,
without any competitive tender. This was the contract
for the implementation of the National Single Window for
the inspection of goods at the ports. This contract is
estimated to be worth more than $300 million over the
next five year. By directing his Minister of Finance to
give the contract to a particular company the President,
by his own logic, had put himself in a position to be
offered and receive bribe.
2. A 15th July 2015 letter
from the Ministry of Transport to the Managing Director
of Smarttys read: “We wish to inform you that the
Ministry in consultation with the Office of the
President has decided to rebrand the buses with the
national colours as well as the images of our present
and past Heads of State... In view of the decision, you
are kindly requested to provide quotations for the
re-branding of the buses together with photographs of a
rebranded bus for our further action.” This deal, also
directly procured from the Office of the President was
done without competitive tender and the cost of this
rebranding to the taxpayer has been found to be over 100
percent inflated. By his own logic, can we not say that
the President was bribed since he was directly involved
in this corrupt and controversial transaction? Again, no
prosecution has come out of this and yet the President
is asking Ghanaians to point out which of his Ministers
has been involved in corruption.
3. President Mahama has
still not responded to charges from no less a person
than Mr Martin Amidu, the then Attorney General, that
President Mills had set up an investigation into the
procurement of an aircraft from Brazil, a deal led and
negotiated by then Vice President Mahama in 2010. It is
worth recalling that even though the manufacturer’s
quoted prices for an Embraer 190 jet ranged between $28
million to $40 million for one with enhanced
accessories, Vice President Mahama negotiated one that
was to be sold to Ghana at the flat rate of $55.26
million, which was to be enhanced to the total cost of
$88 million to the Ghanaian taxpayer. This included
fitting an extra fuel tank costing $8 million; air
staircase costing $1 million and; an in-flight
entertainment costing $1.4 million. The implication of
President Mills setting up such a committee to
investigate his own deputy, who is now the President,
cannot be wished away. It goes to the heart of the
integrity and honesty of President Mahama. Did President
Mills not suspect that his Vice President was bribed
before calling for him to be investigated? It is still
surprising to many Ghanaians that such a charge from the
then Attorney General has not been refuted neither by
President Mahama nor any of the named members of that
committee. Where is the report of that committee?
Ghanaians need to know.
4. In the highly
controversial and unpatriotic $10 STX housing deal, the
Koreans claimed in open court during a dispute among its
local partners that they had spent $10 million in Ghana,
in what is normally called facilitation fee and related
expenses to procure the contract and set up base in
Ghana. Then Vice President Mahama led those
negotiations, which were largely done without the
knowledge of President Mills. Up till today, Ghanaians
have not been told who got those monies and how the
Koreans have been reimbursed if at all.
5. Currently in Brazil, the
President is facing impeachment and executives of some
major construction and engineering firms are either in
jail or being prosecuted over that matter, including the
former President of Queiroz Galvao, This is a company
being accused of money laundering, price fixing, and
kickbacks, including the payment of $30 million on one
contract the ruling party. Vice President Mahama
personally went to Brazil to negotiate deals with
Queiroz Galvao and subsequently as President of the
Republic, John Mahama has ensured that his Brazilian
friends have secured contracts, mainly on sole sourcing,
to the total tune of $595,757,009. Thus, over half a
billion dollars of Ghana’s money in contracts suspected
to be highly inflated have gone to a company that is
struggling in its own home state to keep its bosses out
of jail. Some of the deals handed over to Queiroz Galvao
include the $100 million Tamale International Airport;
the $172.6 million Kasoa Interchange; the 74.88 million
Euros ($85 million) Kwame Nkrumah Circle Interchange
and; the GHC29.23 million Nima Drainage project.
6. In the Armajaro case,
the Times of London newspaper on 31st October 2010
reported that Armajaro had lobbied then Vice President
Mahama and allegedly made payments to get a ban lifted,
a ban that had been placed on the company in Ghana after
an Anas Aremeyaw Anas investigation into cocoa smuggling
though our borders. Vice President Mahama denied ever
lobbying on behalf of the UK company, only to be exposed
by a leaked document from the Foreign & Commonwealth
Office of UK, which showed him travelling to London
specifically to discuss this ban. The British Minister
who facilitated this meeting was paid $150,000 by
Anthony Ward, the CEO of Armajaro Holdings. Such was the
dirty nature of the deal that British civil servants saw
the entire intervention for a British company found
culpable in corruption in Ghana, as improper and corrupt
and leaked it to the British press. How does President
Mahama explain this story against his claim that he has
never put himself in a position to be bribed?
7. In December 2015, again,
led by the Office of the President, $250 million of
proceeds from Ghana’s $1 billion Eurobond, borrowed at a
high interest rate of `10.75%, was secretly and
illegally lodged at the UBA (Gh). This was done without
any competitive bid and behind Parliament, as demanded
by the Bank of Ghana Act. No legitimate paper trail has
been found to follow this transaction and the deposit,
which was used to purchase treasury bills, was for six
months, maturing in June 2016. President Mahama must
tell us the level of involvement of his Chief of Staff
in this transaction. He must also tell us who were to
benefit from the yield of this instrument that was
curiously deposited to mature in just six months,
conveniently in time for the 2016 elections.
The records available to all
Ghanaians show clearly that President Mahama's
government is not only the most tolerant of corruption,
but is also neck deep in corruption, and has the worst
record in fighting corruption in the fourth republic.
The President has claimed
that he has never taken a bribe, although he has been
offered.
A bribe may generally be
defined as taking some inducement (money, houses, cars,
scholarships for children etc) before one performs an
official function or gives some favour to another person
or party.
For the question to be put
this way, not even officials convicted over corruption
charges, nor ministers who have resigned their positions
over corruption, will admit to the taking of bribes!
Fact is the main forms of
corruption this NDC government has engaged in have
included a combination of single sourcing procurement
and what a Supreme Court justice termed "create, loot
and share" schemes. President Mahama in London cited
his government’s prosecution of some officials at the
National Service Scheme as example of his fight and
enforcement of the laws against corruption.
President Mahama should
therefore answer to the world why he has not or would
not enforce the same laws against corruption in the
several other more egregious and blatant cases of naked
corruption and theft of taxpayers’ monies?
1. Why are the perpetrators
of the payment of GHC52.8 million ($35million) to Mr
Woyome still walking free? 2. Why are the
perpetrators of the payment of over $30 million to
Messrs Waterville still walking free? 3. Why are
those who paid GHC72 million ($36million) to Subah for
no work done still walking free and at post? 4. Why
are those public officials working in his office who
perpetrated payments to Rlg and Asontaba in SADA GHC15
million ($9 million) and GHC36 million ($18 million)
still walking free? 5. Why are the perpetrators of
the Smarttys bus branding scandal still walking free,
even when the Attorney General had determined that those
officials should be prosecuted in accordance with the
laws?
6. Why are major public
contracts done through single sourcing leading to
sometimes 200% to 300% inflation of contract prices as
complained about by even the sitting minister of local
government Mr Collins Dauda?
7. Why are those
public officials who colluded and perpetrated payments
in the Gyeeda scandals of over GHC200 million
($100million) to the same Rlgs, Azontabas, Better Ghana
Management Services, Zeeras, etc. still walking free?
In this case of Gyeeda, the
government’s own investigation committee indicted and
demanded the prosecution of officials including
Ministers of State for bribe taking, forgery of multiple
bank accounts and serial awards of contracts to so
called "service providers," even as those contracted
services were not provided!
President Mahama may want
us to believe he is seriously engaged in fighting
corruption. But the glaring cases of naked, bare faced
and blatant corruption that have characterized his
government have left many Ghanaians in deep shock.
In the words of the Chief
Justice of Ghana, corruption today is at a "tipping
point".
In the words of President
JJ Rawlings, who is the founder of the NDC and President
Mahama's former boss, corruption today in Mahama's
government is now "endemic."
...Signed... Nana
Akomea (Communications Director)
|