|
Drug menace? Chicken coming
home to roost
E.
Ablorh-Odjidja, Ghanadot
August 13, 2007
The idea
that it is only between the years 2000 and 2007 that our culture
suddenly grew coarse and now permits violence and drug use is so
absurd that only a propagandist or a liar would want to make
that assertion.
True, the
incidence of drug trade and drug apprehension by authorities
have grown larger.
Hardly a day goes by without some headline in
a local paper bringing these events to our attention.
Among the
most spectacular ones to date, and yet to be explained fully, is
the disappearance of 77 parcels of cocaine from the vessel M. V.
Benjamin, in which a commissioner of police is alleged to be
implicated in the disappearance.
Before
that, there was the case involving a sitting parliamentarian who
was apprehended and jailed in the U.S.A for attempt to import
illicit drugs into that country.
The case
of the two British teenagers is also unfolding in the court
system in Ghana. The enablers behind them are alleged to be
Ghanaians.
Along
with the drug smuggling is a wave of violent crimes, armed
robbery and murder; a culture that is no stranger to the drug
business elsewhere but, as some assume, alien to traditional
life in Ghana.
In South
America, many countries are struggling under the violent
experience of the drug culture, making normal life and
legitimate economic activities in some cities there almost
impossible.
It is,
therefore, not strange to see some Ghanaians being apprehensive
about the state of the burgeoning illegal drug activities in the
country.
For these
folks, the assumption is the drug culture had its nascence
within the past seven years. But how such culture of drug and
violence gained grounds so swiftly in an erstwhile pristine
country is a question that they are yet to consider.
The only
explanation for a view as expressed above is that it is the easy
way out and the most politically correct way for a different
ideology to blame the other, which happens to be in administration.
Forgotten
in the criticism of the current administration’s effort to
control the drug culture is the policing; the frequency and the
efficacy of the prosecution within the court system under the
current administration.
The
critics forget that the criminal types that are hurting our
society today could not have had their beginnings within the
short seven year that the current administration has been in
office. And that it
is a logical impossibility to assume so.
The crime
in the country today is not being perpetrated by seven-year old.
These are not the ones carrying the guns today.
Rather,
it could be logical to assume that those doing the killings and
violence in the drug trade now and the ones providing general
terror to the whole society today belong to a criminal group
that was born before this decade and thus did mature as felons
before the advent of this administration.
Such
criminals in our country are mostly poorly educated and thus
very gullible. So they are conditioned to think the way to a happy life is through
the acquisition of sudden and unqualified wealth; hence the drug
trade becomes an attraction.
It may
not be too uncomfortable to link the politics of our country
today to the growth of the drug culture.
The formative period of the life of the perpetrators of
crime in the country today ties in neatly to our worsening
political condition.
These
felons have known only one political condition; revolution -
violent revolution as politics for social “change.”
From 1966
until now, we have had several revolutions. The most famous or
infamous one was the 1981 revolt. And it was during the period
after that our whole social structure and its culture became
destabilized.
Firing
squad became public spectacles. Schools were closed down at the
sign of least disturbances. Violence was accepted as a way of
settling scores, whether justified or not. And people of means
were made to look like criminals, whether or not they truly
were.
To
buttress the revolutionary spirit of the time, arms were
distributed freely among young tugs, uneducated or poorly
educated.
And the
youth of this period became acclimatized to the violence.
Enter
President Kufuor in 2001 and Ghana began to see an unprecedented
growth in our economy and be seen as one of the foremost
democracies in Africa with growth potential that can catapult
her into the Second World category.
The
criminal types only see in this new reality a potential and the
opportunity to carry on their nefarious activities.
These are
the pests that continue to nurture the criminal types in our
society today.
What the
critics have failed to observe, in response to the proliferation
of drug crime the quick response, is the frequency and efficacy of
the policing efforts that bring the criminal for prosecution
within the court system under this administration.
Within
the same legal system encouraged by the Kufuor regime, the alleged
criminal types will have their day in court rather than being
executed at the firing range, as was done in the previous
regime.
As we
carry on the fight against the drug culture, one thing we must
do is tone down the rhetoric. Ghana is not yet a Colombia where
a Medellin cartel is threatening to bring down the government.
And the "Targor"
of Ghanaian drug trafficking is not at the same level as "Pablo
Escoba."
All the same, we must
encourage our police and the security forces, not dishearten
them from enforcing drug laws, as we must
increase our effort for discipline.
Promote respect for hard work and a culture of deference
for diligent, honest people, whether they are poor or not.
And from
our traditions of old, learn to promote scorn for people with
shady backgrounds and not provide cover for the criminal types by attributing the
wave of crime in the country now to the policies of an
administration in power today.
E. Ablorh-Odjidja, Publisher www.ghanadot.com, Washington, DC,
August 13, 2007 Permission to publish:
Please feel free to publish or reproduce, with credits,
unedited. If posted at a website, email a copy of the web page
to publisher@ghanadot.com. Or don't publish at all.
|