The foreign currency conundrum
E. Ablorh-Odjidja
July 4, 2015
In 1991, Bill Clinton, the soon-to-be president of the US, came to
occupy the White House with the slogan, a true
statement, "It's the economy, stupid."
Need we say something in a similar style for Ghana?
Well, sorry to disappoint.
But our statement should be more fundamental,
such as "It's the philosophy, stupid."
Remember, "Seek Ye First the political kingdom and all things shall
be added"?
When Nkrumah offered it as a guideline it was
grossly or deliberately misunderstood. In truth, his
statement had validity as a unified theory on
development.
And it was made right at the inception of our
nation, at a time when we needed it most.
What happened after that statement?
It was abjectly misinterpreted for something
else - in a needless pursuit of political slander.
Rather than paying attention and thinking about how Nkrumah's
statement could have helped, fabulous brains in
Ghana decided immediately to pooh-pooh the idea.
They had the idea that the first step should be the economy without
thinking that the "Seek ye first" was asking for
the political will for the new nation to seize hold
of everything else in the society, including the
economy!
Seizing or seeking the economy first could not have happened in a
political vacuum or when you have no control over
your destiny.
In any case, we adopted the "the economy first" approach after
Nkrumah was overthrown.
All we have to do now is to look at where
this act has landed us.
The "Seek Ye First," proposal was not just a slogan.
It had a philosophical grounding that defined
the success or failure of the nation-state.
It sought the highest ground in tackling developmental problems
like Nkrumah did with the "Import substitution"
theory in the 60s.
This could have worked for our economy as it
did for South Korea, beginning in the 70s.
Now we have arrived at a point in 2015 when the government of Ghana
is seeking to inject $20mil daily into the economy
to resuscitate the cedi without the "Import
Substitution" theory of the 60s.
Whether The Bank of Ghana (BOG) has enough on reserve to pull off
this ploy on a long-term basis is not the point. The
problem is whether the approach is right for a
developing economy.
Pumping $20 mil daily into the economy is not a creative or
productive idea.
For, very little of the jolt can be
guaranteed to trickle downward to local
manufacturers.
Instead, it will only add to
the purchasing power of traders and importers to
purchase more non-essential goods from abroad.
This indiscriminate usage of the hard currency reserve, with little
view on developmental needs, got us into the mess we
are in today. The cure for this sickness is the
political will already expressed in the "Seek Ye
First" first theory.
This "Seek Ye First" theory understood that the practice of trading
in nonessential goods has exacerbated the woes
within our economy, resulting in the constant
downward push on the cedi.
It then sought to reduce the downward push on
the cedi by promoting local industrial productions.
The attempt was aborted in 1966.
In the wake of the abortion of such a critical theory, one ought to
be able to see the consequence clearly today.
But rather than encouraging the manufacturing of
local goods, cheaper foreign-made products are
brought in to compete with the local manufacturing
base of the same items
- toothpicks, cane chairs, ineffectual
electrical appliances, factory rejects, and used
items purchased from abroad.
The BOG $20ml stimulus is not the solution needed.
As said, it would only go to increase the
purchasing power for frivolous items from abroad.
These are items that the political will can
make happen or manufactured locally.
Again, economies do not operate in a vacuum. They take place in
political incubators, which require the warmth of
guiding principles - a worldview or philosophy.
Just so we don't forget, "Seek Ye First" was one such worldview.
China, Japan, India, and even capitalist
America, at their developmental stages, emphasized
the attainment of home-grown industrial might.
To the last of them, each seized and
exercised the political sovereignty (Seek Ye First)
to take advantage of a trade by minimizing the
importation of goods.
It was under the "Seek Ye First" philosophy of Nkrumah that local
industries began to grow muscle in Ghana.
Products that could be manufactured at home never got the green
light for importation. This way, the country's
foreign reserve was preserved for critical items.
Some who understood the concept back then would come to call it the
"Domestication" policy today.
But for the political spoilers back then, the same
notion was an empty political slogan that needed to
be buried quickly. And they did at the first
chance. Should we cherish the result or must we
backtrack to the first policy of Nkrumah now that
the spoilers have been proven wrong?
Naturally, the "Import Substitution" policy, during its practice,
caused some pain which became the excuse for the
want for "essential commodities," which was the
slogan for the 1966 coup.
For sardines and milk, we upended a sound approach to our entire
development plan for the era. With the lesson
learned, shouldn't we be canning our sardines and
milking our cows locally now, or do we request the
BOG for more stimulus to purchase more of the same
from abroad?
With a simplistic misunderstanding of a deep ideology, we seem to
have herewith crippled our entire growth for decades
and more to come. If this mistaken political
posture is not corrected soon, we will be seeing
more suffering ahead..
Instead of course correction, we have allowed ourselves to be
bamboozled by the West, the very nations that knew
that the policy of "Seek Ye First" could work, and
brought on the destruction of the concept.
They never wanted us to try, much more to succeed.
And in 1966, we went along with the coup they
plotted.
And we took the bait.
Like our local drunk, we said, "to enjoy being
mugged, we don't have to worry about what was on
offer in the glass."
So here we are some 50
years later, now stripped naked of almost all our
ingenuities, we are left to import toothpicks;
plasterboards, motorized tricycle trucks, and other
unnecessary items from abroad; all items that could
be manufactured at home.
In the process, we exposed our foreign reserves for plunder.
Our local "buy and sell" entrepreneurs, are
allowing foreign manufacturers to profit at our
expense.
Our negligence has turned our country into a market for surplus
foreign labor. The unemployable Chinese is likely to
find a job here first before a Ghanaian does. The
result is continuous poverty, which we seem to have
already accepted.
So, like our shirtless friend, the drunk, we go back the world
stage cup in hand,
begging for foreign support for our national
budgets.
Meanwhile, as our foreign debt kept growing from the 60s, we needed
a harbinger of change.
And had it in President Kufuor, who
recognized and spoke out loud on the world stage in
2005 that Ghana was broke.
President Kufuor openly said that to develop, we needed to come out
clean from under our overburdening debt.
This confession brought us HIPC and bought us
time for respite.
Sadly, after Kufuor left office in 2009, the opportunity acquired
under HIPC was quickly squandered.
Our worldview returned to that of the immediate post-1966 coup.
Hard currencies from our reserves continued
to flow outward without a policy like "Seek Ye
First" to stem or guide the flow.
South Korea in the 70s had a similar "Import Substitution" plan.
Suffice it to say we put ours into use before
they did.
South Korea used this policy to buttress its
economy.
Why is South Korea now a success story when ours is
not?
And now this $20 mil daily infusion from BOG. The joke is whether
we do have this amount to spare. Because if we
did our cedi could have already done better against
the dollar!
E. Ablorh-Odjidja, Publisher, www.ghanadot.com, Washington, DC,
July 4, 2015
Permission to publish: Please feel free to publish or reproduce,
with credits, unedited. If posted on a website,
email a copy of the web page to
publisher@ghanadot.com. Or don't publish at all.
|