|
Emerging accountability in West
Africa
By Kofi Akosah-Sarpong
For long, endemic corruption in West Africa has seen the
region engulfed in gruesome civil wars, executions,
state collapse, military coup detats and state
paralyzes. This made the region Africa’s most troubled
and most crime-infested area. Whether in Sierra Leone,
Liberia, Guinea Bissau, Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria or
Mali, corruption saw the state helplessly spinning in
mid air, gaping for accountability.
For some time, accountability wasn’t part of the
region’s development equation (at least in the open) and
it was rare to hear any state official charged with
corruption, convicted, jailed or made to pay for the
money or property stolen. State treasuries were looted
with impunity, transparency was nil and such culture
snowballed into virtually non-existence of maintenance
culture, seeing state property abandoned to rot. Part of
the reason was the political practices then: anarchic
one-party systems and self-serving dictatorial military
juntas deeply addicted to Africa’s notorious Big Man
syndromes that were unaccountable to the people. This
was in the face of weak institutions and unenforced
regulations. As Nigeria’s prominent journalist Dan
Agbese (of Newswatch Magazine) would say, the “typical
African Big Man, dwarfs weakened and wrecked
institutions and relishes his giant status among the
weakened and the wrecked.”
But, gradually, for the past 20 years as democracy
increasingly gains root and anti-corruption campaigners
emboldened and people learn from the painful moral
hazards of corrupt practices and institutions and
regulations being grown, West Africa is progressively
tackling its addictive corruption and fostering
accountability as part of its new development game.
Whether in small Sierra Leone or medium-sized Ghana or
the giant Nigeria, Big Men and Women, top politicians
and elites are being indicted under the new
accountability thinking.
In Ghana, the former Chief of Staff and Minister for
Presidential Affairs under President John Kufour, Kwadwo
Okyere Mpiani, who was the chairman of the National
Planning Committee of the Ghana@50 celebrations and
other prominent political Big Men, are to refund an
amount of US$360,000 in connection with the rental of
Largus Forte Hotel during the Ghana@50 celebrations.
Before this, other Ministers, politicians and
bureaucrats have been indicted.
In Nigeria, spearheaded by its outstanding Economic and
Financial Crimes Commission that has been pushing the
frontiers of accountability by indicting the once
powerful Big Men and Women, the chairman of Nigeria’s
ruling party, Vincent Ogbulafor, has been charged with
fraud. Ogbulafor is accused of fraudulently awarding
US$1.5m in federal funds when he was a government
minister under President Olusegun Obasanjo.
In Sierra Leone, where widespread corruption saw the
country collapsed for almost 14 years, the battle
against corruption is running high with the arrest and
prosecution of some cabinet ministers and senior
government officials. Sierra Leone’s British-funded
Anti-Corruption Commission, increasingly gaining clout
after poor start, has hauled up Hajia Afsatu Kabba, the
then-Minister of Fisheries and Marine Resources, and she
faces 17 counts charges for graft and abuse of office.
In some sort of cooperative journalism and the positive
mimicking of each other, corruption charges are reported
simultaneously across the region’s mass media, broadly
educating the public. It is common to either hear or
read corruption cases in newspapers, radio stations,
mobile phones and wed sites of different West African
countries, some making the lead story. When the chairman
of Nigeria's ruling Peoples Democratic Party, Vincent
Ogbulafor, was charged with fraud, it made one of the
lead stories on the Accra-based Joy FM web site
myjoyonline.com. Similarly, when Sierra Leone’s
then-Minister of Fisheries and Marine Resources, Hajia
Afsatu Kabba, was indicted for graft and abuse of
office, it was carried as one of the top stories in the
Lagos-based Daily Champion.
The news of such corruption charges are emboldening
anti-corruption institutions, civil societies and
anti-corruption campaigners across the region. Some
Ghanaian anti-corruption campaigners have advocated for
the institution of Nigeria’s Economic and Financial
Crimes Commission in Ghana to fight corruption.
In Ghana, some traditional rulers, in rare instances
have weighed in on the corruption issues and argued that
some of the corruption troubles have their roots in
traditional practices. The Asantehene, Otumfuo Osei Tutu
II, Ghana’s most powerful King, recently admonished
bureaucrats and politicians to be wary of corruption and
embrace accountability. The unspoken wisdom through the
Asantehene is that: traditional Ghana/West Africa has
recovered its confidence, its astuteness of goodwill, or
anyway its gift for doing things right in Ghana's and
West Africa’s progress. In the Asantehene,
accountability is as traditional as it is modern.
Certain parts of the Ghanaian/African tradition fuel
corruption, as Jean-Francois Bayart explains in The
State in Africa: The Politics of the Belly, where in an
allegorical nepotistic, corrupt African state government
officials, businessmen and businesswomen, elites,
traditional linchpins and Big Men and Women, sometimes
with the backing of juju-marabout spiritual mediums and
other spiritualists, use their influence to “enrich
themselves, their families or ethnic kinsmen.”
The Asantehene, as traditional leader and accountant,
knows the destructive implications of corruption in
traditional and modern African setting that has
asphyxiated many an African state's progress. In
Criminalisation of the State in Africa, Jean-Francois
Bayart, Stephen Ellis and Beatrice Hibou argue that the
growth of fraud and smuggling in African states, the
marauding of natural resources, the privatization of
state institutions, and the development of an economy of
plunder make garbage of the state and the state itself
becomes a vehicle for organized criminal activity, as
Nigeria and Guinea Bissau show.
Corruption set Sierra Leone, the Democratic Republic of
Congo and Liberia on flames. It saw the angry Ft. Lt.
Jerry Rawlings executing some military Big Men in Ghana;
it saw Foday Sankoh and his Revolutionary United Front
amputating, killing, maiming, arsoning, raping and
counting-looting Sierra Leone; it saw Liberia set on
bonfire and President Samuel Doe killed like an armed
robber with his ears cut off, paraded naked in public
and his disfigured dead body dumped in an unknown grave.
For long, endemic corruption has paralyzed Guinea
Bissau, making it helpless and mired in some sort of
permanent bereavement.
Unaccountability, that sparked military coup detats, saw
all sorts of despicable people emerge on the African
scene and further destroyed Africa. It saw “small boys”
like Sierra Leone's Valentine Strausser and Samuel Doe
waving matches and playing on the volatile African
political scene and setting it on fire. At the extreme
end, Liberians, Sierra Leoneans, Kenyans, Congolese and
Nigerians will sadly tell you terrible stories about the
moral dangers of unaccountability and how it has negated
their progress despite their immense natural wealth.
The Asantehene's idea is to make the case that
accountability is as traditional as it is the soul of
modern democratic practices and that tradition can help
curb unaccountability. And the fact that how healthy a
society is, is revealed in how accountable it is unto
itself. As the crusade against corruption mounts, the
Asantehene's traditional moral authority, in a holistic
sense, makes him a perfect person to speak on
accountability, in a non-partisan position, since many a
corruption indictment has been interpreted as
“politically motivated.” This will throw light on a
troubling development cancer, and thus the darkness that
hover on unaccountability to recede a bit.
Accountability, as an anti-dote to corrupt practices,
hugely defines progress. The American economist John
Kenneth Galbraith said “Hard, visible circumstance
defines reality.” The reality of the African
accountability campaigns is that it hasn't been
addressed also from African culture, perhaps the key
source of corruption. Now, in a holistic reasoning based
on the African environment, as Jean-Francois Bayart
argues in The State in Africa: The Politics of the
Belly, the African culture is increasingly being
factored in the campaigns against corruption.
More instructive in the emergent West African
accountability thinking is Ft. Lt. Jerry Rawlings’s
Ghana. In the past 20 years, public accountability,
despite Rawlings' executions, threats, exiling and
blowing markets into pieces, has been slow. Operating in
no-party, military juntas, with all democratic
antecedents muzzled, the almost 20 years of Rawlings
rule wasn't openly accountable – for there was no
democratic daylight into Rawlings' conclave. Watchdog
roles to track corruption were virtually absent.
Anti-corruption institutions were weak, wrecked or
none-existent compared to Nigeria that has set up the
remarkable Economic and Financial Crimes Commission to
tackle corruption. In the final analysis, Rawlings and
his associates (who branded themselves as socialists as
against the corrupt capitalists) are better of
materially today than when they came to power.
Logically, in Rawlings’ accountability universe we saw
that, “moral concepts are lovely, but the key is
governing these things by law,” as Elena Bonner, widow
of Russian human rights campaigner Andrei Sakharov,
said.
Still, the lessons for West Africa’s crusade against
corruption can be drawn from Rawlings’s adventure on the
Ghanaian political scene. In Rawlings, who projected
himself as chief-priest of anti-corruption,
accountability campaigns do not work in authoritarian
regimes but better under democracies as Ghanaians and
West Africans are experiencing today and as prosperous
Mauritius and Botswana will tell West Africans. And that
has given the traditional Asantehene the platform to
speak out on accountability and corruption. In Rawlings,
there are huge hypocrisy in the Ghanaian/West African
accountability universe, with the boundary between
conflict of interest and liability blurred.
Rawlings’ wife Nana Konadu Agyemang, the then-First
Lady, and associate political big wigs bought state
companies when they were in power, using their powerful
influence and state money by manipulating conflict of
interest regulations in their favour. This made public
accountability weak and at the mercy of the
powers-that-be instead of healthy public institutions
and regulations to deal with it. In Nigeria, a group of
high-ranking military personnel, mostly during the Gen.
Ibrahim Babangida and Gen. Sani Abacha military juntas,
demonstrate the networked nepotism characteristic of
Bayart’s The Politics of the Belly by looting billions
of dollars. In his four short years in power, Gen.
Abacha and his family embezzled over US$4 billion.
Compare Rawlings’s hot-headed Ghana to the cool-headed
Mauritius, which has the best development indicators in
Africa. As David Carment (of Canada’s Carleton
University) and Yiagadeesen Samy (of Canada’s Carleton
University and the North-South Institute) have argued,
Mauritius teaches Ghana and West Africa that
accountability and anti-corruption campaigns, as part of
the fertilizers for progress, is grown not with
atrocious authoritarianism with its acute threats, fear
of being killed and unfreedoms, public and private
executions, brutal suppression, tyranny, deaths and
extreme arbitrariness but good institutions and
regulations represented by the rule of law, right
leadership, democratic traditions and freedoms,
especially freedom of the press, as well as property
rights. The Mauritian miracle comes from this.
By talking about accountability and corruption, the
Asantehene opens the floodgate for West African
policy-makers, civil societies and anti-corruption
campaigners to look also from the Ghanaian/West African
culture when addressing corruption. This will aid the
growing West African institutions and regulations
currently tackling corruption as progress concern and
help bring deeper order in a region that has seen much
anarchy largely because of deadly sleaze and
unaccountability.
Kofi Akosah-Sarpong,
Canada,
April 28, 2010
|