Is the NPP so cheap and
weak?
By Dr. Michael J.K. Bokor
Monday, November 9, 2015
Folks, if the allegation against Paul Afoko and
Kwabena Agyepong is true that they are NDC moles in
the NPP, we should congratulate the NDC for being on
task to walk over its arch rival. But is that
allegation really true? And where is the evidence to
support it? If no evidence exists, why is it being
played as the trump-card to remove Afoko and
Agyepong from office?
Obiri Boahen, Deputy General Secretary of the NPP,
has warned that “NDC moles” in the NPP will be
identified, exposed, and flushed out. The belief is
that the NPP isn’t making much progress because of
such moles. My friends, do you see how the NPP does
its rogue and book politics to its own disadvantage?
We are bent on dissecting the NPP to know why it is
what it is and why it is still fixated on using
anachronistic methods to no avail in contemporary
Ghanaian politics. We note upfront that such
anachronistic methods as used by its forebears in
the pre-independence era fetched them nothing but
public scorn, which explains why the Great
Osagyefo’s CPP took the shine out of them at the
1951 and 1954 general elections and successfully
prevailed over the British colonial establishment to
grant Ghana what it needed to come into its own.
We note further the back-stabbing machinations of
the anti-Nkrumah elements that resulted in their
being isolated for punitive action and why the
Preventive Detention Act was imperative to clamp
down on their anti-Ghana activities. Don’t forget
their bomb-throwing escapades, scare-mongering
campaigns, and selective sabotage of public
institutions and installations in pursuit of their
narrow political agenda. Nkrumah contained them till
they sought external support from the US’s Central
Intelligence Agency to confirm their notoriety in
the 24th February 1966 coup d’état against him.
Ghana has not been the same ever since.
That aspect of Ghana’s history must not be lost on
us, especially as we reflect on current goings-on.
It explains why the NPP isn’t giving the Mahama-led
administration the peace of mind it needs to
administer Ghana’s affairs. It underscores the
negative politics being done by the Akufo-Addo-led
NPP; and that kind of politics will fail to woo
voters. And when it does, it leaves the NPP with
nothing but the selfsame anachronistic methods to
find fault where there is none, to shift blame when
it suits it, and to eat up its own children when it
suits its leaders.
Of all the allegations used to oust Paul Afoko from
office, none confirms the NPP’s paranoia more than
that which portrays him as “an NDC mole” planted by
the Mahama-led administration to use his office for
the NDC’s good. We have heard so much that Afoko is
being paid by the NDC to destroy the NPP and
frustrate its Akufo-Addo’s ambition to become
Ghana’s President “at all costs”. This allegation
has gained currency among the rank and file of the
party’s buffs; and they are trumpeting it all over
the place. They have even gone further to splash it
on Kwabena Agyepong, the party’s General Secretary
too. We will do a brief analysis of this allegation
for all that it is.
We begin with Afoko. For all that he has been all
these years in party politics, Afoko is known for
nothing other than his surefooted support for the
NPP. He has his interests and is perceived as a
staunch supporter of Alan Kwadwo Kyerematen, one of
those seeking the topmost position to lead the NPP.
We know why he was assaulted at the NPP national
delegates conference preceding Election 2008 and
what happened thereafter until he strongly
resurfaced to win the hearts of the party’s
delegates to be elected as the National Chair.
We know further why he chose to use his powers to
revamp the NPP and why he stepped on toes to push
himself to the brink of disaster. In all that has
happened to make him the bull’s eye for the archers
in the Akufo-Addo-led NPP, we know that he sought to
do nothing but ensure transparency in the management
of the party’s affairs, especially its finances. And
no political party can survive if its finances are
not secured. That was why he concentrated on aspects
that put him on a collision course with the National
Treasurer and Freddie Blay who had done shady deeds
(the secret accounts with Ecobank, for instance). We
note that Afoko simply sought to streamline matters
but ended up being seen as an enemy within to be
squashed. And what to do but frame him up as
violating the NPP’s laid-down administrative
procedures?
Once constructed as such, what else to do but to
paint him black and destroy? The strategies for such
a venture aren’t far-fetched. Afoko saw through it
all and dug in, refusing to be sucked into the
vortex. He knew why he won’t call meetings to
empower his detractors, and he knew why as the
National Chair he won’t sit down to be cajoled. It
was not as if his not convening meetings of the
NPP’s NEC crippled the party or prevented its
followers from reaching out to the public. As the
National Chair, he knew what his purview was and
stayed on track. Only his detractors saw things
differently. Their allegations that he disrespected
the party’s elders or that he was arrogant and
incompetent couldn’t do the intended damage unless
fleshed out with something more sinister and
frightening to the NPP pack.
That was why a new allegation was coined and added
to the complexion. He was framed up as a mole
planted by the NDC to destroy the NPP. No one could
explain what his being a mole was nor could any of
his detractors tell us where, when and how he got
recruited as an NDC mole tasked to destroy the NPP
from within. None of his detractors could provide
any shred of evidence on that allegation; but it has
been used as the most potent weapon of calumniation
to under-value and destroy him.
Questions left hanging need answers. At what point
in his service to the NPP did Afoko become a mole
for the NDC? Before he was elected as the National
Chair, just after his elevation, or when at all?
Who, among his detractors, will be bold enough to
tell us the truth of Afoko’s being a mole to do the
NDC’s bidding?
Folks, I am amazed that the NPP leaders who are bent
on damaging Afoko cannot rise above pettiness. If
they are persuaded that Afoko is anti-Akufo-Addo,
getting rid of him to serve their purposes should
have been done in a move civilized manner than what
has happened so far. I know it for a fact that their
targeting Afoko has a lot more to it than they are
telling us. And it won’t redound to their own good.
As we can see from the repercussions, Afoko has much
constituency in the NPP. Framing him up as an NDC
mole may be suitable for only “emotional” purposes
but not for the political capital that the NPP and
its Akufo-Addo need to be in power at Election 2016.
Truth be told, what has happened so far will have a
negative sequel to draw back the NPP’s
electioneering campaign moves. Let it be said now
that Akufo-Addo and his followers have succeeded in
slighting Afoko only to set the stage for more
internal wrangling that will tear the party apart.
We have heard from Sammy Crabbe and the four
constituency chairmen in the Ashanti Region who have
been suspended for showing open support for Afoko.
There is also talk of the Odododiodoo constituency
chairman in Accra.
What those suspending such party supporters don’t
know is that there are thousands more who are
aggrieved and will do all they can for their impact
to be felt now or later. Once such disaffected
people know what to do and how to do it, they will
harm the NPP’s interests. And they will have nothing
to lose after all because they are far removed from
the path of the gravy train. They know that whether
their party is in power or not, they don’t benefit
materially. They may enjoy only the bragging rights
("My party is in power"). All that they do is to
exercise their democratic right of voting.
Thereafter, anything goes. Only those who know how
to walk the corridors of power benefit. So, why
bother at all? But their vote counts!!
Folks, we haven’t left out Kwabena Agyepong. He is
also being accused of being an NDC mole. How
infuriating! If anybody should be accused as such,
it won’t be Agyepong, who is known all over as an
avowed opponent of anything NDC. Where is the
evidence to prove that he has turned coat? Even Dr.
Charles Wereko-Brobby who is saying that he doesn’t
believe in anything like Danquah-Busia ideology has
his peace of mind after being suspended by the NPP’s
Sanhedrin. He is saying it as it should be said.
What amazes me all the more is that all those
alleging that Afoko and Agyepong are NDC moles
haven’t provided any evidence to support their
accusation. All they are doing is bandying about
that allegation and insisting that it be accepted as
the truth inviolate. This is how anachronism works
in the NPP’s kind of politics. And it is as
foundational as it is deceptive and
counter-productive.
For now, those chasing Afoko and Agyepong out will
continue to flex muscles; but when the day of
reckoning comes, they will realize their stupidity.
Then, let them take on the Establishment to blame
for their political woes. Only then will they know
that contemporary Ghanaian politics demands more
than their anachronistic tactics toward winning
general elections. If the NDC can weaken the NPP by
recruiting its staunch adherents as moles, let it go
ahead to do so. After all, doesn’t one good turn
deserve another?
I shall return…
• E-mail: mjbokor@yahoo.com
• Join me on Facebook at: http://www.facebook.com/mjkbokor
to continue the conversation.
|